Distributed Waste-to-Energy
and
Renewable
Organic Resources
Michael Theroux
JDMT, Inc
January 2001
Organic products, bi-products and wastes of many sorts can be
subjected to thermal, chemical, and/or biological degradation. Breaking the complex carbon-hydrogen bonds to
release energy is the guiding thermodynamic principal of "bio-energy" generation. The inherent economic development
potential has been called the “Carbohydrate Economy", recognizing benefits to be derived from turning waste
carbon-hydrogen bonds into commodities. Conversion of organics through processing into fuels, and transformation of
those fuels into power, can now be accomplished efficiently, cleanly and cost-effectively.
Lessons to be Learned
The technologies we hope
to commercialize and deploy for distributed energy (DE) generation exhibit characteristic needs and barriers
already recognized and met by other innovative technological advances. Looking to these progenitors for guidance is
a worthy task. Resource recovery industrial development is a rich source of inspiration, particularly with the
study of such recently commercialized commodities markets as that for recycled newsprint, and the diversification
of industrial plastics and glass recovery.
Aggregation and value-added processing of dispersed resources
has always been critical for the recycling & resource recovery industries, just as this has been a key to
economical fuel production for the petroleum industry. Ours is now a slightly different paradigm: add the value at the source and site of use through
direct conversion to energy, rather than by attempting to transport materials to central processing stations. We
still must understand the economics of aggregation, however, to really assess the avoided costs of on-site organics
conversion DE.
Some DE organic conversion system
configurations are highly effective and well proven, and have been available for at least a decade (e.g., use of
plug-flow and full-mix animal waste digesters, as methane generators). These may now be considered "known
technologies", with accessible operations and
maintenance (O&M) records. Similarly, landfill-gas fueled power
generation and sewage treatment plant methane co-generation should both be recognized as important, long-standing
examples of distributed waste-to-energy resources. These technologies should be promoted now as venues for
retro-fit deployment of high-efficiency, low emissions bio-gas fueled converters of waste to electric power and
heat (e.g., advanced micro-turbines and fuel cells). Wet-cell landfilling, designed and operated to maximize
waste degradation and methane generation, is a sharp contrast to past "perpetual grave" landfilling practices; this
biogas source has been repeatedly demonstrated as cost-effective, particularly when a full life-cycle assessment
can recognize the deferred long-term management costs.
New Tools, Old Problems
Advanced in-vessel anaerobic digestion systems capable of
high-volume methane (and hydrogen) generation are being successfully demonstrated around the country and seem to
hold great promise. Designs are quite scalable and are clearly past the "bench test" stage. Rapid global
commercialization of these eloquent waste conversion technologies, with concomitant decrease in the costs brought
about through large-scale manufacturing, promises to bring such forms of DE to many communities currently
disenfranchised by their relative lack of quality low-cost power. Strategic business alliances that facilitate an
infrastructure capable of global-scale distributed waste-to-energy conversion, the “surround” for systems such as
the advanced biogas utilization generators, should be encouraged now at all industrial and institutional
levels.
Development of liquid bio-fuel
has most commonly been represented by large-scale ethanol industrial efforts. Yet ethanol fermentation in and of
itself is certainly not relegated to a particular scale. Again, the tenants of energy deregulation and deployment
of distributed energy generation would argue for decentralization of both the actual ethanol generation industrial
facility and of the infrastructure that it requires. Given an increasing market for industrial DE spurred by the
economics of converting wastes and bi-products to commodities, today's bench-scale experimental unit may find very
important market niches for highly customized demand-side waste conversion. The food processing industry is
probably the most obvious target for on-site combined heat and power generation from their own waste
streams.
"Pyrolysis"; "Thermolysis";
"Incineration"; "Thermal Transformation": jargon for various forms of organic conversion technologies suitable to
DE. There has been an amazing wealth of research and development in furnace design, properties of thermal
decomposition, contaminant management and fuel conversion efficiencies. In the past, markets have been open only
for massive centralized converters. This knowledge base now needs to be applied to two smaller-scale targets: (a)
characterization of potential feedstock from: agricultural, silvicultural, industrial wood products waste
management (and again, the food processing industries), and (b) optimization of scale, to find which elite thermal
conversion mechanisms can be fired upon that demand-side, process- sustained feedstock
generation.
Combined Heat & Power
(CHP)
Thermal conversion alone is
seldom sufficient to justify capital costs. The heat thus generated must be reclaimed and utilized. European
“district heating” from biomass combustion is an example of the diversity and efficacy of small and mid-range
thermal technologies. To date, tools to generate electric power from that heat resource have been relatively
limited, consisting of a variety of (a) boilers, connected to (b) steam turbines. We are now witnessing the
successful emergence of new power generation technologies at these smaller “community” scales, systems such as
kinematic and non-kinematic externally-fired stirling-cycle engines. There is a great need for co-engineering heat
exchange technologies, externally-fired power generators, and high-efficiency small furnaces, to match combined
heat and power capabilities to sustainable feedstock generation rates and community energy
profiles.
Many of the developers of small
scale renewable, biomass-driven combined
heat and power units remain pre-commercial. A few globally are now becoming market ready. Others are relatively
advanced after decades of trial and error, yet may carry legacies of missfires, contaminant wrecks, inelegant
engineering and unstable business practices.
Gasifiers fit this last profile,
where past failures taint future possibilities: great technological strides are being made, yet agencies
still are reluctant to approve
gasifier-based DE. The diverse and far-reaching arena of "Waste-to-Energy" itself remains an anathema, in the eyes of
most state and federal agencies. Only thorough and objective scientific scrutiny can effectively counteract the
clinging preconceptions accompanying early disaster to prove efficacy and credibility for new advances, given the
weight of poor past performance. All the more reason to concentrate on standardized specifications,
cross-technology comparison, outside engineering validation and closely-monitored demonstration.
Distributed waste-to-energy as a concept is more comprehensible,
easier to grasp, and may indeed have a better chance at overcoming public and agency angst than does the
entrenched, centralized multi-megawatt
waste-to-energy industry.
Economic Incentives for
Environmental Remediation
When we safely and economically offer "greener" alternatives to
environmentally deleterious management practices, we may even turn environmental liabilities into economic
commodities. The deferred dollar value of introducing DE as a Best Available
Technology (BAT) for waste management can significantly aid commercial
purchase amortization. Where DE systems can interject themselves into existing industrial process regimes without
creating undue chaos while evincing a net economic improvement, on-site conversion for combined heat and power
(CHP) may not need to depend on grid inter-connect and an equitable electric purchase/sale contract to be
competitive. Perhaps most exciting: the capability to provide CHP from on-site produced feedstocks could actually
make remote environmental remediation efforts economical.
Total Systems Perspective
Often, the focus of
Distributed Energy Resource discussion tends
to be the final electricity-generating mechanisms in the path, and on the infrastructure necessary for grid
inter-tie. Yet we recognize that there is much more than the last "black box" necessary to DE deployment. The
importance of "front-end" infrastructure has been exemplified by the waste-to-commodity market structures now
complimenting classic industries of waste management: source reduction,
resource recovery, and environmental impact mitigation.
A life-cycle approach to
financial and environmental cost/benefit assessment is a critical step to DE commercialization and social
acceptance. To facilitate this difficult process, all elements of the DE system must be characterized. How else can we hope to directly compare
costs, efficiencies and contaminant management between a diesel-driven internal combustion engine, a natural
gas-fueled turbine, a hydrogen fuel cell, and a bio-fueled stirling engine design? Further, life cycle assessment
is becoming the global standard for any process analysis, and external engineering validation is the requisite for underwriting and
"bankability".
Broadening our life-cycle perspective to include all potential DE infrastructural components
in the path to final utilization, we can better understand and compare the many emerging technological forms of
distributed generation. Greater systems diversity translates into more thorough market penetration by the combined
DE industries, and thence to broader market acceptance.
This article is copyrighted. You are free to
reprint and use it as long as no changes are made to its content or references, and credit is given to the
author.
Back to Archives Main Page
|